By Rich Alvarez
Disclaimer: This week I feel compelled to veer a little off the usual topic matter in light of the recent terror attacks both in Paris and Los Angeles, as well as it being the anniversary of Pearl Harbor. The normal reentry theme will resume next week. I want to preface this by letting you know this is an opinion piece by a regular guy. I’m not political or history expert, but I am an avid buff and a former Political Science major. I realize that there will be those who disagree with me, but I hope it doesn’t dissuade you from reading my blog in the future or utilizing my site if you need it. It is just an opinion after all.
First of all, I want to say that I give all of the victims of the attacks and their families my thoughts and prayers. I also want to say that I condemn anyone who kills innocent victims and uses a religion to justify their actions. There is no justification for taking the lives of innocents. With that being said, it may surprise some of you, given my work, that my political leanings are often conservative. I agree with many of the positions of conservative leadership like more personal freedom and less government interference, support of law enforcement, the second amendment, capitalism, reduced taxes and a strong military. On other topics, I tend to be more liberal. I am against the death penalty, am pro criminal justice reform, believe in helping the less fortunate, believe in anthropogenic caused global warming, and support the legalization of marijuana. One of the most important points that I support is the pursuit of strict anti-fossil fuel laws for several reasons. Of course I like clean air, and I want to stop global warming, but I am more concerned with energy independence from a national security standpoint. You might ask how this ties into terrorism? Well, I’ll tell you, and no, it doesn’t follow Bernie Sanders’ logic.
While the President and Mr. Sanders are correct that if we don’t stop global warming, our children will be unable to enjoy living by the coast, and our military and police will be tied up dealing with these catastrophic changes at home, that is not the primary reason for my concern. I believe dependence on foreign oil is key to the current terrorism concerns we are experiencing. In order to understand this, we must first understand a little bit about the Middle East. The West has a long and not-so-proud history in the Arab world, which started with English colonization during the heyday of the British Empire. The British had little understanding of the cultural differences among the people in the nations they conquered, and I doubt they cared. The people of the Middle East were largely tribal and nomadic. There were also cultural, ethnic, and religious differences. When the British drew national boundaries, they did so without regard to the differences, which resulted in splitting up some groups and bringing together others that hated one another. Because they ruled with an iron fist, these groups appeared, at least on the surface, to get along. As an example, Sunni Islam and Shiite Islam are very different and can’t stand each other. If left to their own devices they would have chosen to live separately or kill each other. In Iraq for example, the Shiite were the majority, but the Sunni dominated the capital city of Baghdad. Oil was also discovered in many of these nations, which helped fuel the industrial revolution and brought great riches to those who controlled the wells. Therefore, the West had great interest in the Middle East.
When the British left, they often supported iron fisted dictators who could hold the nations together, as opposed to fostering democracies. These dictators controlled the oil wells and enriched themselves instead of sharing it with the people who lived in utter poverty and under abusive regimes. Western nations continued to meddle in the affairs of these countries to ensure continual access to the oil that fueled their economies. If a dictator got out of line, they fostered a revolution so another, more favorable, leader could take over. If the people became restless and wanted to revolt, they would funnel better weapons and more money to the dictator to prop him up. Our addiction to fossil fuels fostered oppression and abuse of the people of the Middle East, so we could keep driving our cars. A resentment toward the United States and other Western nations grew. It grew even more, when after WWII, we established the state of Israel. While no one disputes that the Jews were abused and deserved a homeland, it displaced many Arab peoples and put them in the middle of their arch enemies. The United States supported the new Jewish state by providing them with advanced weaponry and money, which was used against the Middle Easterners in that region.
Things really began to change in the 1970’s when radical Shiite Muslims ousted the American-supported Sha of Iran. This resulted in the taking of American hostages at the U.S. Embassy. There were also a rash of anti-American terrorist incidents including the downing of a Pan Am airline by Libyan supported terrorists and the killing of Jewish athletes at the Olympics. We have continued to meddle in the affairs of the Middle East, and we support one side or the other depending on who seems to support our interests at the time. The problem with that is that we give little thought to the long-term consequences. One example was the horrible decision to invade Iraq after 9/11. Iraq had nothing to do with the terrorist attacks, and Bush had a personal grudge to settle, because Saddam Hussein had tried to have his family assassinated. We tried to install a democratic government, and when we did, they threw American forces out of their country. It subsequently descended into chaos. The current example is ISIS. The Syrian dictator, Bashar Assad, is vehemently anti-American, and is abusive to his people. The U.S. has wanted to get rid of him for some time, and the Arab Spring, which overthrew several Middle Eastern dictators, provided the opportunity. Like Egypt and Libya, the Syrian people rose up against their oppressor. The United States supported this, thinking it would result in democracies in the their place. Libya fell apart and the Egyptian government that resulted was just as, if not more oppressive, than the one they overthrew. In fact, it was primarily composed of members of the Muslim Brotherhood, one of the oldest Islamic terrorist groups in the world. They oppressed women and killed anyone who did not adhere to their strict version of Islam. President Obama supported this government with money and weapons, but the Egyptian military finally overthrew them and re-established order. Assad did not go so easily as these other two examples.
Assad cracked down on the rebels and used chemical weapons on them. A prolonged civil war has ensued and hundreds of thousands of people have been killed. Furthermore, millions of Syrians have fled their homes and headed for Europe. The United States supported the Syrian rebels and gave them weapons to fight the regime. Most of these rebels were Sunnis, while Assad is Shiite. One of the groups we, and other Sunni Arab nations have supported, was ISIS. ISIS grew strong, but they got bigger than we could control. They exploited the chaos in Syria and Iraq and carved out a nation of their own in these two countries. The crazy part is that the Sunni groups we have given support to are either sympathetic to or member of the same people we have been fighting in other areas like Afghanistan and Iraq. They hate us but have no problem taking our weapons and money. To make matters worse, the Assad regime is sponsored by two of our enemies, Russian and Iran. Oh what a tangled web we weave.
All of this comes down to our dependence on oil. We are embroiled in all of these conflicts because we want their oil. We have supported regimes that oppress and kill the people of that region, and we have killed many ourselves. It is little wonder that they hate us. The answer is really simple. We could solve 90 percent of the Muslim terrorist problem with the United States by extricating ourselves from the Middle East by becoming less foreign oil dependent. Developing green technologies and using our own shale oil in the meantime is the best way to reduce terrorism against the United States. We will still have periodic problems due to our support of Israel, but we can resolve the majority of the issue by this simple policy shift. This is where I diverge from my Republican friends. While they may deny climate change and resist green technology, they do have an interest in national security. Green energy and domestic oil production as a national security tool could be a way to bridge the differences between Democrats and Republicans who are diametrically opposed on so many issues today.G